Prop 65 Counsel: Petition for Certiorari Filed with SCOTUS in Supplements Case

Prop 65 Counsel: What To Know

Petition for Certiorari Filed with SCOTUS in Supplements Case

Law Street

A petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States was filed against respondent Environmental Research Center, Inc. asking the court to provide clarity on when an appeal from a remand order is precluded under statute. The petition states this action commenced as a private enforcement action by the respondent/plaintiff against the petitioners for failing to include required warnings on nutritional supplements under California’s Proposition 65.

Notice of Modification to Text of Proposed Regulation Title 27, California Code of Regulations Proposed Amendments to Article 6 Clear and Reasonable Warnings – Short Form

OEHHA modified the text of the proposed amendments to the short form Proposition 65 warning regulations changing provisions addressing label size, catalog and internet warnings, and other issues.

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Amendment to Section 25705 Specific Regulatory Levels Posing No Significant Risk: 1,3-Dichloropropene

OEHHA proposes to adopt Proposition 65 No Significant Risk Levels (NSRLs) for 1,3-dichloropropene by amending Title 27, California Code of Regulations, section 25705(b). The proposed NSRLs for oral and inhalation exposures to 1,3-dichloropropene are 3.7 micrograms per day.